Motivation: The Polynomial Theory
Star
Tribune Sales and Marketing
Published June 27, 2003
A great learning source for people that work in the Human
Resources field is generally that of interviewing candidates.
This process allows for in-depth conversations with individuals
that come from diverse backgrounds and have different
experiences that can many times lead to finding new ideas and
enriching thoughts.
During an interview with an excellent candidate for a Trade
Marketing Manager position, I discovered a new approach to
motivation, one that I call the Polynomial Theory. The
definition for polynomial is a similar expression in more than
one variable. This mathematical definition also applies to the
Human Resources field.
During my conversation with the candidate, he explained the
reasons why he would change from his current job to the one we
were offering. The candidate told me that his motivation to work
was a combination of different factors. These factors in turn,
had a different relative weight, and the sum of these factors
made up his motivation to work. "As a polynomial" he said.
What Motivates People
From Maslow’s Theory of Motivation to our days, pages and pages
about human motivation have been written. Behavioral scientists,
psychologists, and business people, have searched to understand
what makes people do what they do. Organizations are constantly
looking at different ways by which they can "motivate"
employees, improve workforce morale and create better work
environments.
The fact is that motivation is not a small topic, many times the
results of individuals and teams, relate to their motivation.
Any individual can produce different results, depending on the
degree of motivation he has when performing a task, project or
activity.
I believe that organizations cannot motivate their employees;
instead, they can create a work environment where individual
motivation flourishes. All individuals have different
motivational factors; but, if they find the right environment
they will create their own self-motivation.
Some organizations apply "motivational plans" to boost employee
morale. Many times HR professionals are asked: "to motivate"
people or create programs that will do so. Companies that
implement these types of programs usually get meager results
within the short term. During the long term, these superficial
actions have a negative effect, as people’s apathy and cynicism
grows.
Many times managers believe that if they have a problem with
their employees’ morale, the company can create a "magic" morale
boosting campaign that will solve all the problems.
On the other hand organizations that really care about employee
motivation have ways of collecting data about the work
environment, then the upper staff members talk to their
employees on how morale can be improved, and take corrective
actions.
Employee motivation is usually at a high level when the
organizations, the individual objectives and values are aligned.
Motivational Factors
It is very important for managers to understand that different
factors motivate different people. We call these factors
"motivational factors".
It is also key to understand that not all people are motivated
by a single factor; instead they are motivated by a series of
factors.
The motivational factors change during the course of time,
greatly depending on the particular phase that an individual
might be
going through, whether it be in his personal life or career.
When people are asked what factors motivate them to work, we
generally receive answers, such as:
o The organization for which they work.
o The work environment.
o Their boss.
o Money.
o The achievements they can produce when they play a specific
role.
o Recognition.
o The power that a position enables them with.
o Status.
o Their peers, team and co-workers.
o The work schedule.
A simple way to expose these factors is by means of a
polynomial, whereby we add the elements that motivate a person.
Let ‘s take Anne as an example:
Anne’s motivation = Salary + Her boss + Power + Work Schedule +
Work Atmosphere + Co-Workers.
Each factor also bears a different weight in Anne’s motivation
formula:
Anne’s motivation is equal to: Salary (20%)+ Her boss (50%) +
Power (10%) + Work Schedule (10%) + Work atmosphere (5%) +
Co-Workers (5%).
In Anne’s case, her biggest motivation to work comes from her
boss, followed by salary, power, work schedule, work atmosphere
and co-workers.
Constant Change
Motivation changes depend on the individual's personal life and
career phase (as well as many other instances).
In Anne’s case, being a recent college graduate that is taking
her first steps in a corporation, her boss is the primary source
of motivation. Her boss is an excellent coach and provides her
with guidance and continuous training.
The motivation factors might change as she wants to apply for a
loan to buy a house, then salary can become a more relevant
motivating factor.
If Anne gets married and has kids, work schedule might become a
key factor in determining her motivation to work in a specific
position, as she wants to spend more time with her kids.
The polynomial theory gives us a vision as to how motivational
factors interact and vary, depending on the person we are
analyzing and the timing when the analysis is being made.
So, What Do We Use It For?
Understanding people's motivations is a key competency to being
an effective leader, manager or team member.
If we understand the motivation factors, it will be easier to
create a work atmosphere where motivation flourishes. There is
not a unique formula as to how to create this atmosphere.
Nevertheless, if we understand the motivation factor, we will be
more likely to take actions that create employees’ satisfaction.
If we do not understand this, we can take actions that are
neutral or even counterproductive. For example, if an employee
is motivated by work related achievements and we give him a
salary increase, probably this will have little effect on his
motivation. On the other hand, if we assign him to a relevant
project, this will probably have a positive effect on his
behavior.
As organizations cannot magically motivate employees, it is the
role of leaders, managers and team leaders to continuously
monitor the motivational factors of their employees. This
continuous exercise will allow them to take the right actions
and to improve individual motivation.
Understanding the dynamics of how individual motivation works
can make the difference between a successful leader and one that
is not.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Miguel Premoli is the Human Resources Director for PepsiCo’s
Concentrate operations in the Americas Region overseen
operations in Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela,
Puerto Rico, USA and Canada. He has worked in the HR field for
more than 12 years in companies like Colgate Palmolive, Wal-Mart
Stores and Neoris Consulting. He served most of his career in
Argentina, were he is from, and has published articles in many
HR and Business magazines. miguel.premoli@intl.pepsi.com